Super-Majority Leadership Doesn’t Like Criticism


Kudos to Civil Beat and Chad Blair for being the only ones covering all of Tuesday’s nine hours of floor debate including the tiff with Speaker Joe Souki that almost got me removed from the House floor.

The only problem was that Mr. Blair got my quote wrong.

When my colleague, Rep. Richard Fale, was being rudely interrupted in his floor speech by Majority Leader Scott Saiki, I said, “Mr. Speaker, point of order — there is nothing in the House Rules that says we can’t criticize this body.”

Blair quote me as saying “members” instead of “this body”.

This caused an immediate recess to wit Speaker Souki got all upset when I said, “Joe, this is America — not Russia, you just can’t shut people down like that.”

After I said this, he called for the sergeant-at-arms to have me removed from the floor, but subsequently changed his mind by the time the sergeant-at-arms arrived.

So much for freedom of speech when you can’t criticize your own legislature — not its members, as Mr. Blair suggested I was doing.

Generally I wouldn’t comment on things like this because I am pretty used to it, but I think it is time for the public to know a bit more about our inner workings at the Capitol.

Compared to the state Senate, freedom of speech in the House is rather limited, especially against members of the minority who are more likely to be critical and honest about what they think about legislation.

So when a member is saying something that leadership doesn’t like, the bullying begins, though they call it “sticking to the merits of the bill.”

What they really mean is that you should not say anything negative about an overly sensitive super-majority leadership that disdains criticism of its legislation.

Rep. Fale’s remarks did not deserve to be shut down, but in a one-party state with 69 Democrats and seven Republicans, freedom of speech must be fought for and protected.


0 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All